I have been following this story closely but have been reluctant to write about it, because I did not want my response to come from a place of defensiveness or frustration. Many of my Reiki colleagues are concerned, anxious and angry at the USCCB’s decision that Reiki therapy is “unscientific and inappropriate for Catholic institutions.” Previous to this decision, there were some Catholic medical centers that did offer Reiki to their patients, but have since stopped.
I was initially taken back by the ruling, but have since had more time to read through the USCCB’s Guidelines for Evaluating Reiki as an Alternative Therapy, and as someone who has studied comparative religions and as a Christian (baptized Catholic, but now a Presbyterian through affirmation of faith) I can understand how the Bishops came to their conclusion. I don’t necessarily agree with all of it, but let’s be clear that Christians of any major denomination generally “recognize […] two kinds of healing: healing by divine grace and healing that utilizes the powers of nature.” In other words, either God has interceded and caused a miracle of healing, or it has occurred as a result of medical science. Furthermore, Christian denominations are generally in agreement that:
The Holy Spirit sometimes gives to certain human beings “a special charism of healing so as to make manifest the power of the grace of the risen Lord.” This power of healing is not at human disposal, however, for “even the most intense prayers do not always obtain the healing of all illnesses.
This is the belief that healing occurs spontaneously and without directive from any other human being in attendance. And of course we know about those people in the church’s history who were given special abilities to heal by laying-on of hands or simply by in the presence of others. Those are the saints of the church.
Examining spiritual and religious differences
OK, so what does this all mean? Basically, the U.S. Catholic Church feels Reiki is a technique that is accomplished “at human disposal” because it is ability conferred by one human being to another and not by Divine Providence and therefore, does not qualify as “mak[ing] manifest the power of the grace of the risen Lord.” They do not recognize the term “universal life energy” as being synonymous with the divine power of the Holy Spirit. Eastern spiritual traditions believe in the idea of there being an inherent energy (“chi”, “ki” or “prana”) present in all living things and represented in the universe around us. This “life-force energy” is derived from a Divine Source and also contains that Source. Christians do believe that we are made in the image of God, but do not necessarily believe that we are physical manifestations of Divine nature. Reiki is not technically a religious tradition, but it does borrow some of its spiritual elements from esoteric Buddhist practices and syncretic Japanese culture. All of these dogmatic differences make Christian leadership uneasy because it’s not a spiritual practice that developed within the doctrines and culture of the Christian church and contains language and a set of assumptions they are not congruent with their worldview.
Reiki and the natural human power of thought and will
Where I don’t agree with their evaluation is their belief that Reiki is a technique or ability that is “subject to manipulation by the natural human power of thought and will.” One thing that makes Reiki different than some other forms of energy healing is that it does not rely at all on our physical or spiritual ability or effort. Mikao Usui, the founder of Reiki (Usui Reiki Ryoho) had a deeply profound spiritual experience wherein he immediately understood the nature of this energy as being guided by a Higher Intelligence. Reiki flows independently of what the practitioner might will or intend, and does not cause a depletion of physical energy so it is not originating within the body of or directed by the practitioner. One of my students just remarked to me the other day how surprised he was that he could come home from work, physically and mentally exhausted, and yet still be able to channel Reiki to his wife without feeling like it was anything he was drawing from internally. Regardless of where we place our hands, Reiki will go where it’s needed, which is why clients will often remark how they came in for one issue and noticed how much it helped a different one that they didn’t even mention at the time.
Very superstitious writings on the wall
My other issue with the USCCB’s evaluation is the belief that this practice amounts to superstition:
A Catholic who puts his or her trust in Reiki would be operating in the realm of superstition, the no-man’s-land that is neither faith nor science. Superstition corrupts one’s worship of God by turning one’s religious feeling and practice in a false direction.
It’s one thing to say that a particular practice or technique is not appropriate for someone who believes in a set of doctrines and worship as specified by a particular religious institution. I can accept that. However, to dismiss a practice completely as something “false” (implying somehow that it is dangerous) because it doesn’t fit into your worldview is short-sighted and intolerant, especially when it is part of another culture’s history and belief systems. One person’s “superstition” is another person’s belief system. I would like to hope that we could move towards a world where religious and spiritual differences would be met with curiosity and tolerance, rather than fear and rejection. There are no reports I am aware of where Reiki has done harm to anyone, and significant anecdotal evidence points to its beneficial effects. To me, something that would produce harmful effects would be leading its practitioners in a false direction, not something like Reiki, which is done out of love, compassion and the calling to provide comfort and relief to those who are suffering.
The natural science dilemma
Finally, the Bishops reject Reiki on the grounds that it lacks scientific credibility. While no study has proven exactly how Reiki works, there are quite a few studies that validate some of Reiki’s beneficial effects in the clinical setting, and more are underway. Despite not having universal medical and scientific acceptance, a number of hospitals and health care centers use Reiki as an adjunct therapy for their patients, with the goal of providing support, stress relief and improved quality of life through care. Eventually, I think we will see more of a shift towards acceptance of Reiki with certain therapeutic benefits, similar to guided meditation, acupuncture and chiropractic. I talk about this a bit in my blog post, Reiki, Science and Belief. Interestingly, the Veterans Administration is using Reiki as a therapeutic approach along with other therapies, in their hepatitis C program and to help returning veterans heal physically and emotionally from their experiences in combat. (For more information, see Fort Bliss’s Warrior Resilience Program.) What we do know is that Reiki facilitates the body’s relaxation response, which is beneficial for stress relief. As practitioners, we need to be clear when we recommend Reiki for someone that we let them know Reiki is indicated for that purpose primarily, but they may see other benefits depending on their own body’s level of responsiveness to the therapeutic aspects of touch.
How will you continue to practice?
If the U.S. Catholic Church believes Reiki is inappropriate for their followers to practice or receive based on their own spiritual criteria, then I feel I should respect their opinion as they have interpreted the Word of God and the teachings handed down to them over the centuries. I don’t have to like it, but it is not for me to tell them how and what to believe. The Vatican generally disapproves of most CAM (Complementary and Alternative Medicine) modalities associated with “New Age” practices, specifically those that invoke the use of Spirit or energy. If you mention acupuncture and focus solely on the Western view that it works to engage nerve impulses in a certain way, you’re probably in reasonably safe territory. But if you start talking about how acupuncture affects the flow of “chi”, it’s not acceptable. The same can be said for chiropractic, Rolfing and other bodywork.
As it has been for decades (or centuries, depending on your perspective) Catholics will either choose to follow the directives or not, as they do with most other rulings that come from country-based leadership or the Vatican. Also know that just because the U.S. Catholic Church has taken this position does not mean that every other Christian denomination (or other religious denominations) will follow suit either at the national or local level. I’m not worried that Reiki is going to be banned outright in the world. After all, it is not “superstition” or mumbo-jumbo to millions of people either raised in or comfortable with non-Western beliefs and practices. There will always be those people who take certain views of Scripture and feel that Reiki is not appropriate for them. In those cases, we need to respect their beliefs and let it go with love. There are many paths to healing, and Reiki is but one of them.
We Reiki practitioners should continue to practice with compassion, tolerance and understanding, because that is what our calling as healers requires us to do. It is not about pushing our beliefs or opinions on others (even if we have been witness to miracles) or turning away from those who don’t believe in or reject what we are doing. We need to respond to these situations with an open and loving heart. Answer any questions or concerns that are directed to you about Reiki, but be prepared to accept that even though you may feel connected to God or the Holy Spirit in a very profound way that others might not be open to your experience or interpretation. I wish the Reiki for Christians web site was more current but I really like their perspective on Reiki practice, which can also extend to potential recipients:
By reading, seeking those who have given or experienced Reiki, and praying for insight and guidance, Christians can make decisions about how Reiki might play a role in their lives. It’s important to keep in mind that while many Christians have found Reiki to be a spiritually fulfilling practice, it is not necessarily for everyone.
Ultimately, we have to trust that God will lead those people to the healing they seek when they are ready. If that’s Reiki, so be it, but if it’s not we have to extend our prayers and hopes that whatever healing they receive will be of benefit for their highest good.
Note: I welcome comments on this post, but please try to keep them respectful and informed.